Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC declared amendments to CGST and KGST Acts unconstitutional, finding retrospective modifications ultra vires the Constitution. The court held that legislative amendments improperly expanded the definition of "supply" and "service" by disregarding the principle of mutuality. The retrospective taxation violated fundamental principles of fairness and Rule of Law, as it imposed unexpected tax burdens on entities without prior notice or opportunity to adjust. The amendments were deemed void, emphasizing constitutional limitations on legislative power to redefine taxation principles retroactively. The judgment reinforced constitutional protections against arbitrary legislative interventions in taxation frameworks.
HC declared amendments to CGST and KGST Acts unconstitutional, finding retrospective modifications ultra vires the Constitution. The court held that legislative amendments improperly expanded the definition of "supply" and "service" by disregarding the principle of mutuality. The retrospective taxation violated fundamental principles of fairness and Rule of Law, as it imposed unexpected tax burdens on entities without prior notice or opportunity to adjust. The amendments were deemed void, emphasizing constitutional limitations on legislative power to redefine taxation principles retroactively. The judgment reinforced constitutional protections against arbitrary legislative interventions in taxation frameworks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
