Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
HC allowed petitioner's challenge regarding CENVAT credit utilization, affirming that input tax credit electronic ledger represents a unified wallet with compartments for IGST, CGST, and SGST. The court referenced prior precedent emphasizing that tax credit eligibility should be assessed based on total wallet balance, not individual compartments. The 3rd respondent was directed to issue fresh orders within two months, consistent with the judicial interpretation, effectively resolving the inadvertent tax credit mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A forms.
HC allowed petitioner's challenge regarding CENVAT credit utilization, affirming that input tax credit electronic ledger represents a unified wallet with compartments for IGST, CGST, and SGST. The court referenced prior precedent emphasizing that tax credit eligibility should be assessed based on total wallet balance, not individual compartments. The 3rd respondent was directed to issue fresh orders within two months, consistent with the judicial interpretation, effectively resolving the inadvertent tax credit mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A forms.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
