Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
HC granted an unconditional stay of GST demand due to the absence of a constituted Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 of the GST Act. The court recognized the petitioners' statutory right to appeal and noted the Tribunal's non-existence. An interim stay was issued on the demand in Form GST APL-04, with directions for affidavit-in-opposition to be filed within eight weeks and potential reply within four weeks thereafter. The stay was granted for four weeks, acknowledging the petitioners' prima facie case.
HC granted an unconditional stay of GST demand due to the absence of a constituted Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 of the GST Act. The court recognized the petitioners' statutory right to appeal and noted the Tribunal's non-existence. An interim stay was issued on the demand in Form GST APL-04, with directions for affidavit-in-opposition to be filed within eight weeks and potential reply within four weeks thereafter. The stay was granted for four weeks, acknowledging the petitioners' prima facie case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
