Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the assessment order under sec. 153C was invalid due to lack of proper satisfaction regarding incriminating material. The AO failed to establish a direct correlation between search materials and the assessee's income for AY 2019-2020. Consequently, the PCIT's revisionary order under sec. 263 was deemed illegal and void ab initio. The tribunal emphasized that an illegal assessment order cannot be legitimized through revisionary powers. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the assessee, quashing both the assessment order and the revisionary proceedings.
ITAT held that the assessment order under sec. 153C was invalid due to lack of proper satisfaction regarding incriminating material. The AO failed to establish a direct correlation between search materials and the assessee's income for AY 2019-2020. Consequently, the PCIT's revisionary order under sec. 263 was deemed illegal and void ab initio. The tribunal emphasized that an illegal assessment order cannot be legitimized through revisionary powers. The order was ultimately decided in favor of the assessee, quashing both the assessment order and the revisionary proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.