Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC found the writ petition maintainable, quashing the sale certificate and declaring it null and void. The court ordered respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 9,93,752.94 with 12% interest, foreclose the loan account, and remove the freeze on the petitioner's savings account. Additionally, the court directed RBI to investigate respondent No. 1's actions, imposed Rs. 5,00,000 compensation, and emphasized the critical importance of due diligence in auction sales, highlighting the bank's failure to disclose property encumbrances and conduct proper verification before sale.
HC found the writ petition maintainable, quashing the sale certificate and declaring it null and void. The court ordered respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 9,93,752.94 with 12% interest, foreclose the loan account, and remove the freeze on the petitioner's savings account. Additionally, the court directed RBI to investigate respondent No. 1's actions, imposed Rs. 5,00,000 compensation, and emphasized the critical importance of due diligence in auction sales, highlighting the bank's failure to disclose property encumbrances and conduct proper verification before sale.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.