Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
HC found the writ petition maintainable, quashing the sale certificate and declaring it null and void. The court ordered respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 9,93,752.94 with 12% interest, foreclose the loan account, and remove the freeze on the petitioner's savings account. Additionally, the court directed RBI to investigate respondent No. 1's actions, imposed Rs. 5,00,000 compensation, and emphasized the critical importance of due diligence in auction sales, highlighting the bank's failure to disclose property encumbrances and conduct proper verification before sale.
HC found the writ petition maintainable, quashing the sale certificate and declaring it null and void. The court ordered respondent No. 1 to refund Rs. 9,93,752.94 with 12% interest, foreclose the loan account, and remove the freeze on the petitioner's savings account. Additionally, the court directed RBI to investigate respondent No. 1's actions, imposed Rs. 5,00,000 compensation, and emphasized the critical importance of due diligence in auction sales, highlighting the bank's failure to disclose property encumbrances and conduct proper verification before sale.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.