Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving loan disbursement and potential deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). The tribunal found that the loan was sanctioned jointly with co-applicants and disbursed to a company, which subsequently transferred funds to the assessee. Critically, the tribunal determined the transaction did not constitute a deemed dividend because the funds originated from a bank loan, not accumulated profits. The addition made based on Internal Audit Party observations was deemed unsustainable, as no incriminating material was discovered during search proceedings. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, effectively quashing the tax assessment and rejecting the proposed addition under the specified provision.
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving loan disbursement and potential deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e). The tribunal found that the loan was sanctioned jointly with co-applicants and disbursed to a company, which subsequently transferred funds to the assessee. Critically, the tribunal determined the transaction did not constitute a deemed dividend because the funds originated from a bank loan, not accumulated profits. The addition made based on Internal Audit Party observations was deemed unsustainable, as no incriminating material was discovered during search proceedings. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, effectively quashing the tax assessment and rejecting the proposed addition under the specified provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.