Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT remanded the case to the AO for compliance with DRP's directive regarding transfer pricing adjustment. The tribunal acknowledged the DR's concession that the AO had not implemented the prescribed +/- 3% arm's length price adjustment under section 92C(1). The matter was restored to the AO's file to ensure proper application of the DRP's direction, specifically to grant the mandated transfer pricing adjustment within the statutorily defined percentage range.
ITAT remanded the case to the AO for compliance with DRP's directive regarding transfer pricing adjustment. The tribunal acknowledged the DR's concession that the AO had not implemented the prescribed +/- 3% arm's length price adjustment under section 92C(1). The matter was restored to the AO's file to ensure proper application of the DRP's direction, specifically to grant the mandated transfer pricing adjustment within the statutorily defined percentage range.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
