Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
ITAT remanded the case to the AO for compliance with DRP's directive regarding transfer pricing adjustment. The tribunal acknowledged the DR's concession that the AO had not implemented the prescribed +/- 3% arm's length price adjustment under section 92C(1). The matter was restored to the AO's file to ensure proper application of the DRP's direction, specifically to grant the mandated transfer pricing adjustment within the statutorily defined percentage range.
ITAT remanded the case to the AO for compliance with DRP's directive regarding transfer pricing adjustment. The tribunal acknowledged the DR's concession that the AO had not implemented the prescribed +/- 3% arm's length price adjustment under section 92C(1). The matter was restored to the AO's file to ensure proper application of the DRP's direction, specifically to grant the mandated transfer pricing adjustment within the statutorily defined percentage range.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
