Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s order, rejecting revenue's appeal. The tribunal upheld the lower authority's findings on multiple legal issues: (1) assessee qualified for long-term capital gains tax exemption under Section 54F by owning only one residential house at share transfer date, (2) sale proceeds of gifted shares from son were not unexplained cash credit under Section 68, and (3) unsecured loans from family members with proper documentation were not assessable as unexplained income. The tribunal found no merit in revenue's contentions and dismissed the appeal, maintaining the original order that deleted additions made by the Assessing Officer.
ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s order, rejecting revenue's appeal. The tribunal upheld the lower authority's findings on multiple legal issues: (1) assessee qualified for long-term capital gains tax exemption under Section 54F by owning only one residential house at share transfer date, (2) sale proceeds of gifted shares from son were not unexplained cash credit under Section 68, and (3) unsecured loans from family members with proper documentation were not assessable as unexplained income. The tribunal found no merit in revenue's contentions and dismissed the appeal, maintaining the original order that deleted additions made by the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
