Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC ruled that provisional attachment under Section 110(5) of Customs Act, 1962 cannot exceed one year. Section 110A is inapplicable when attachment period expires, precluding extension beyond statutory timeframe. The court determined that once the one-year period lapses, the provisional attachment automatically ceases, and parties cannot invoke Section 110A to maintain the attachment. Consequently, the court granted relief by raising the attachment of petitioners' bank accounts, effectively terminating the provisional seizure.
HC ruled that provisional attachment under Section 110(5) of Customs Act, 1962 cannot exceed one year. Section 110A is inapplicable when attachment period expires, precluding extension beyond statutory timeframe. The court determined that once the one-year period lapses, the provisional attachment automatically ceases, and parties cannot invoke Section 110A to maintain the attachment. Consequently, the court granted relief by raising the attachment of petitioners' bank accounts, effectively terminating the provisional seizure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
