Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
HC ruled that provisional attachment under Section 110(5) of Customs Act, 1962 cannot exceed one year. Section 110A is inapplicable when attachment period expires, precluding extension beyond statutory timeframe. The court determined that once the one-year period lapses, the provisional attachment automatically ceases, and parties cannot invoke Section 110A to maintain the attachment. Consequently, the court granted relief by raising the attachment of petitioners' bank accounts, effectively terminating the provisional seizure.
HC ruled that provisional attachment under Section 110(5) of Customs Act, 1962 cannot exceed one year. Section 110A is inapplicable when attachment period expires, precluding extension beyond statutory timeframe. The court determined that once the one-year period lapses, the provisional attachment automatically ceases, and parties cannot invoke Section 110A to maintain the attachment. Consequently, the court granted relief by raising the attachment of petitioners' bank accounts, effectively terminating the provisional seizure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
