Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT determined windshield glass set classification, holding the imported goods fall under CTI 70071100 rather than CTH 87089900. The tribunal found the goods did not exclusively constitute motor vehicle parts, possessing multiple functional uses beyond automotive applications. The windshield glasses, characterized as "toughened (tempered) glass", were specifically covered under CTH 7007. The tribunal noted pre-2001 finance bill amendments did not classify such items as vehicle parts. Consequently, the revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the original classification under CTI 70071100 as legally appropriate for the imported windshield glass set during the disputed period.
CESTAT determined windshield glass set classification, holding the imported goods fall under CTI 70071100 rather than CTH 87089900. The tribunal found the goods did not exclusively constitute motor vehicle parts, possessing multiple functional uses beyond automotive applications. The windshield glasses, characterized as "toughened (tempered) glass", were specifically covered under CTH 7007. The tribunal noted pre-2001 finance bill amendments did not classify such items as vehicle parts. Consequently, the revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the original classification under CTI 70071100 as legally appropriate for the imported windshield glass set during the disputed period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.