Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a procedural order related to a company petition. The tribunal held that the impugned order did not dilute any party's rights and was merely a procedural order recording submission of notes. The appellant failed to challenge the main order dated 18.12.2024 and had already complied with previous directions by filing submissions. Consequently, the appeal challenging the procedural order was deemed non-maintainable, consistent with established judicial precedent that procedural orders are not independently appealable. The appeal was dismissed without addressing the substantive merits of the underlying company petition.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal challenging a procedural order related to a company petition. The tribunal held that the impugned order did not dilute any party's rights and was merely a procedural order recording submission of notes. The appellant failed to challenge the main order dated 18.12.2024 and had already complied with previous directions by filing submissions. Consequently, the appeal challenging the procedural order was deemed non-maintainable, consistent with established judicial precedent that procedural orders are not independently appealable. The appeal was dismissed without addressing the substantive merits of the underlying company petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.