Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT analyzed the interplay between IBC, PMLA, and SARFAESI Act, holding that Section 14 moratorium does not preclude property attachment under PMLA. The tribunal rejected appellant's challenge, finding no merit in arguments regarding statutory precedence. Section 32A immunity was inapplicable as resolution plan conditions were not satisfied. The attachment of properties remains valid, with the court emphasizing that different statutes serve distinct legislative purposes. Consequently, the appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the original attachment order and maintaining the enforcement mechanism under PMLA.
AT analyzed the interplay between IBC, PMLA, and SARFAESI Act, holding that Section 14 moratorium does not preclude property attachment under PMLA. The tribunal rejected appellant's challenge, finding no merit in arguments regarding statutory precedence. Section 32A immunity was inapplicable as resolution plan conditions were not satisfied. The attachment of properties remains valid, with the court emphasizing that different statutes serve distinct legislative purposes. Consequently, the appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the original attachment order and maintaining the enforcement mechanism under PMLA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.