Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2881 to 2900 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC found a violation of natural justice where respondent issued a personal hearing notice before reply deadline and subsequently passed an order without considering petitioner's detailed reply. The impugned order was contrary to Section 75(4) of GST Act, as the petitioner was not provided a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The HC set aside the order dated 30.04.2024 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
HC found a violation of natural justice where respondent issued a personal hearing notice before reply deadline and subsequently passed an order without considering petitioner's detailed reply. The impugned order was contrary to Section 75(4) of GST Act, as the petitioner was not provided a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The HC set aside the order dated 30.04.2024 and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
