Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC adjudicated a case involving multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) with overlapping assessment periods. The court acknowledged existing final assessment orders and stipulated that any subsequent order would be contingent upon the writ petition's ultimate outcome. The respondents were mandated to submit written replies within three weeks, with the petitioner granted two additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on 19.03.2025, effectively maintaining procedural continuity while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the assessment orders through the pending writ petition.
HC adjudicated a case involving multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) with overlapping assessment periods. The court acknowledged existing final assessment orders and stipulated that any subsequent order would be contingent upon the writ petition's ultimate outcome. The respondents were mandated to submit written replies within three weeks, with the petitioner granted two additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on 19.03.2025, effectively maintaining procedural continuity while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the assessment orders through the pending writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
