Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC adjudicated a case involving multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) with overlapping assessment periods. The court acknowledged existing final assessment orders and stipulated that any subsequent order would be contingent upon the writ petition's ultimate outcome. The respondents were mandated to submit written replies within three weeks, with the petitioner granted two additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on 19.03.2025, effectively maintaining procedural continuity while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the assessment orders through the pending writ petition.
HC adjudicated a case involving multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs) with overlapping assessment periods. The court acknowledged existing final assessment orders and stipulated that any subsequent order would be contingent upon the writ petition's ultimate outcome. The respondents were mandated to submit written replies within three weeks, with the petitioner granted two additional weeks to file a rejoinder affidavit. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on 19.03.2025, effectively maintaining procedural continuity while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the assessment orders through the pending writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
