Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, rejecting the claim that the transfer of assets through a restructuring scheme constituted a demerger under section 2(19AA). The tribunal found the transaction was a specific asset transfer to liquidate debts, not meeting demerger criteria. The assets were transferred at fair market value, with the land sold at Rs. 65 crores against an indexed cost of Rs. 68.32 crores, and shares transferred to settle liabilities. The tribunal upheld the assessee's method of recording transactions, deleted disallowances related to notional interest on inter-group loans, section 14A provisions, and staff welfare expenses, essentially ruling in favor of the assessee's computational approach and commercial rationale.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, rejecting the claim that the transfer of assets through a restructuring scheme constituted a demerger under section 2(19AA). The tribunal found the transaction was a specific asset transfer to liquidate debts, not meeting demerger criteria. The assets were transferred at fair market value, with the land sold at Rs. 65 crores against an indexed cost of Rs. 68.32 crores, and shares transferred to settle liabilities. The tribunal upheld the assessee's method of recording transactions, deleted disallowances related to notional interest on inter-group loans, section 14A provisions, and staff welfare expenses, essentially ruling in favor of the assessee's computational approach and commercial rationale.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.