Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT found appellant failed to provide credible explanation for possession of Rs. 87,15,472/- in cash. Appellant's statements were inconsistent, changing multiple times regarding the source of currency notes. Despite claiming notes were for exchange from multiple persons, only two summoned individuals denied providing currency. Appellant could not produce documentary evidence supporting his claim of exchanging torn/soiled notes or justifying retention during Code of Conduct period. Contradictory statements regarding ownership, including sudden inclusion of father's involvement, undermined appellant's credibility. AT upheld Adjudicating Authority's order, finding appellant's narrative unreliable and dismissing the appeal.
AT found appellant failed to provide credible explanation for possession of Rs. 87,15,472/- in cash. Appellant's statements were inconsistent, changing multiple times regarding the source of currency notes. Despite claiming notes were for exchange from multiple persons, only two summoned individuals denied providing currency. Appellant could not produce documentary evidence supporting his claim of exchanging torn/soiled notes or justifying retention during Code of Conduct period. Contradictory statements regarding ownership, including sudden inclusion of father's involvement, undermined appellant's credibility. AT upheld Adjudicating Authority's order, finding appellant's narrative unreliable and dismissing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
