Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT upheld provisional attachment of properties under PMLA related to environmental violations involving illegal waste disposal. The tribunal found no procedural irregularities in the attachment order, affirming that: (a) property mortgage to financial institution can co-exist with PMLA attachment, (b) evidentiary documents seized during investigation were appropriately handled, and (c) technical omissions do not invalidate proceedings. The court emphasized that the investigating authority has discretion in selecting documentary evidence, and the attachment was justified based on proceeds of crime originating from environmental law violations. Appeal against the attachment order was comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the provisional attachment of properties.
AT upheld provisional attachment of properties under PMLA related to environmental violations involving illegal waste disposal. The tribunal found no procedural irregularities in the attachment order, affirming that: (a) property mortgage to financial institution can co-exist with PMLA attachment, (b) evidentiary documents seized during investigation were appropriately handled, and (c) technical omissions do not invalidate proceedings. The court emphasized that the investigating authority has discretion in selecting documentary evidence, and the attachment was justified based on proceeds of crime originating from environmental law violations. Appeal against the attachment order was comprehensively dismissed, maintaining the provisional attachment of properties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
