Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the Assessment Order u/s 153C was not time-barred due to COVID-19 related limitation extensions. The statutory period for passing the order would have expired on 31.03.2023, but governmental disruptions and subsequent legislative measures like Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and TOLA 2021 effectively extended the limitation period. The court ruled that the assessment order was within jurisdiction, overruling the petitioner's objection. The respondent shall apply preponderance of probability standard and make efforts to produce the director for cross-examination within six months.
HC held that the Assessment Order u/s 153C was not time-barred due to COVID-19 related limitation extensions. The statutory period for passing the order would have expired on 31.03.2023, but governmental disruptions and subsequent legislative measures like Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and TOLA 2021 effectively extended the limitation period. The court ruled that the assessment order was within jurisdiction, overruling the petitioner's objection. The respondent shall apply preponderance of probability standard and make efforts to produce the director for cross-examination within six months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.