Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving wind power generation unit transfer. The tribunal held that the transfer between parties constituted a valid slump sale, thereby enabling deduction under Section 80IA(4). The assessee's claim for deduction was substantiated by proper documentation, including Form 3CEA and transaction certificates. The tribunal distinguished the case from a prior precedent involving windmill sales, affirming the eligibility for tax deduction. Furthermore, the tribunal rejected the disallowance of depreciation, confirming that depreciation was correctly computed based on the asset's written down value and in compliance with Section 43(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving wind power generation unit transfer. The tribunal held that the transfer between parties constituted a valid slump sale, thereby enabling deduction under Section 80IA(4). The assessee's claim for deduction was substantiated by proper documentation, including Form 3CEA and transaction certificates. The tribunal distinguished the case from a prior precedent involving windmill sales, affirming the eligibility for tax deduction. Furthermore, the tribunal rejected the disallowance of depreciation, confirming that depreciation was correctly computed based on the asset's written down value and in compliance with Section 43(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.