Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that indexation benefit for property acquisition shall be calculated from the allotment date (3/12/2010), allowing cost indexation based on payments made during financial year 2010-11. The tribunal determined the property's acquisition date as the allotment letter date, permitting the assessee to claim indexed cost of acquisition. Additionally, the tribunal allowed brought forward long-term capital losses to be set off against long-term capital gains, noting no substantive reason existed to deny the claim, particularly since prior assessment orders had not challenged similar claims. Ground raised by the assessee was consequently allowed in entirety.
ITAT held that indexation benefit for property acquisition shall be calculated from the allotment date (3/12/2010), allowing cost indexation based on payments made during financial year 2010-11. The tribunal determined the property's acquisition date as the allotment letter date, permitting the assessee to claim indexed cost of acquisition. Additionally, the tribunal allowed brought forward long-term capital losses to be set off against long-term capital gains, noting no substantive reason existed to deny the claim, particularly since prior assessment orders had not challenged similar claims. Ground raised by the assessee was consequently allowed in entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.