Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT determined that the importer failed to conclusively prove lack of knowledge regarding export of expired drugs. Despite multiple transactional relationships, the appellant could not substantiate claims of non-awareness. The tribunal rejected arguments about consignment value and re-importation timelines, noting Pipavav was not a notified port for medicine imports. The procedural irregularities and lack of definitive evidence led to a partial allowance of the appeal, with the matter to be referred to a regular bench for further adjudication under customs regulations.
CESTAT determined that the importer failed to conclusively prove lack of knowledge regarding export of expired drugs. Despite multiple transactional relationships, the appellant could not substantiate claims of non-awareness. The tribunal rejected arguments about consignment value and re-importation timelines, noting Pipavav was not a notified port for medicine imports. The procedural irregularities and lack of definitive evidence led to a partial allowance of the appeal, with the matter to be referred to a regular bench for further adjudication under customs regulations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.