Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, finding that the authorized signatory was valid and the previous dismissal violated principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order dated 30th July 2024 and directed Respondent No.2 to restore the appeal to the file for fresh consideration on merits, ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity to be heard.
HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, finding that the authorized signatory was valid and the previous dismissal violated principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order dated 30th July 2024 and directed Respondent No.2 to restore the appeal to the file for fresh consideration on merits, ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
