Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC allowed petition challenging tax determination order under GST Act. The court found the proper officer erroneously dismissed the taxpayer's rectification application without adequately examining the bonafide mistake in tax credit intimation. The HC held that when taxpayers demonstrate genuine errors and seek immediate rectification, they should not be penalized with exorbitant liabilities inconsistent with constitutional principles. The impugned order was set aside, directing the proper officer to reconsider the rectification application and reassess the tax liability with a comprehensive review of available records.
HC allowed petition challenging tax determination order under GST Act. The court found the proper officer erroneously dismissed the taxpayer's rectification application without adequately examining the bonafide mistake in tax credit intimation. The HC held that when taxpayers demonstrate genuine errors and seek immediate rectification, they should not be penalized with exorbitant liabilities inconsistent with constitutional principles. The impugned order was set aside, directing the proper officer to reconsider the rectification application and reassess the tax liability with a comprehensive review of available records.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.