Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
ITAT allowed the appeal and remanded the case for reassessment. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the assessment order, specifically noting that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not provide the assessee an opportunity to submit a Valuation Report from a Merchant Banker using Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method. The Tribunal directed the assessee to procure a fresh Valuation Report compliant with Rule 11UA of Income Tax Rules, 1962, and instructed the CIT(A) to review the report, obtain a remand report from AO, and provide reasonable hearing opportunity to the assessee before making a final determination on the share premium addition under Section 56(2)(viib).
ITAT allowed the appeal and remanded the case for reassessment. The Tribunal found procedural irregularities in the assessment order, specifically noting that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not provide the assessee an opportunity to submit a Valuation Report from a Merchant Banker using Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method. The Tribunal directed the assessee to procure a fresh Valuation Report compliant with Rule 11UA of Income Tax Rules, 1962, and instructed the CIT(A) to review the report, obtain a remand report from AO, and provide reasonable hearing opportunity to the assessee before making a final determination on the share premium addition under Section 56(2)(viib).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
