Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
ITAT allowed partial relief to the assessee, directing deletion of multiple disallowances. The tribunal found no merit in the AO's disallowance of vehicle depreciation and interest expenses, citing possession and usage of assets as key determinants of ownership. Business promotion expenses appeal was dismissed due to cash expenditure. Loan interest disallowance was deleted citing insufficient nexus. The tribunal also set aside notional income addition on building construction expenditure and 5% salary expenses disallowance, emphasizing lack of substantive evidence and procedural irregularities in the AO's assessment. The ruling predominantly favored the assessee by directing removal of several disputed additions.
ITAT allowed partial relief to the assessee, directing deletion of multiple disallowances. The tribunal found no merit in the AO's disallowance of vehicle depreciation and interest expenses, citing possession and usage of assets as key determinants of ownership. Business promotion expenses appeal was dismissed due to cash expenditure. Loan interest disallowance was deleted citing insufficient nexus. The tribunal also set aside notional income addition on building construction expenditure and 5% salary expenses disallowance, emphasizing lack of substantive evidence and procedural irregularities in the AO's assessment. The ruling predominantly favored the assessee by directing removal of several disputed additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.