Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
ITAT held that the assessee, a company director, was not liable for additional tax assessment on share premium. The tribunal rejected revenue's attempt to reassess share valuation, finding no procedural default in the original merchant banker's valuation. The shares issued at Rs. 12,628.20 per unit were deemed appropriately valued under prescribed rules. The tribunal specifically noted that different valuation methodologies cannot be arbitrarily applied when an initial valuation has been correctly determined. Consequently, the revenue's appeal was comprehensively dismissed, upholding the original assessment and protecting the assessee from supplementary tax liability on share issuance.
ITAT held that the assessee, a company director, was not liable for additional tax assessment on share premium. The tribunal rejected revenue's attempt to reassess share valuation, finding no procedural default in the original merchant banker's valuation. The shares issued at Rs. 12,628.20 per unit were deemed appropriately valued under prescribed rules. The tribunal specifically noted that different valuation methodologies cannot be arbitrarily applied when an initial valuation has been correctly determined. Consequently, the revenue's appeal was comprehensively dismissed, upholding the original assessment and protecting the assessee from supplementary tax liability on share issuance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
