Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
NCLAT upheld NCLT's rejection of recall application, finding appellant lacks locus standi under Sections 241 and 242 of Companies Act. The tribunal determined that Section 44 of Evidence Act does not provide grounds for intervention by a non-party to original proceedings. The court emphasized that appellant, as spouse of original party, cannot challenge the order or cost imposition when the primary litigant's challenge was unsuccessful. The appeal was dismissed, confirming NCLT's original order and maintaining the procedural integrity of the legal process.
NCLAT upheld NCLT's rejection of recall application, finding appellant lacks locus standi under Sections 241 and 242 of Companies Act. The tribunal determined that Section 44 of Evidence Act does not provide grounds for intervention by a non-party to original proceedings. The court emphasized that appellant, as spouse of original party, cannot challenge the order or cost imposition when the primary litigant's challenge was unsuccessful. The appeal was dismissed, confirming NCLT's original order and maintaining the procedural integrity of the legal process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
