Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Page of 4920
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 98394 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the capital reduction scheme under Section 66 of Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal found the selective capital reduction permissible, with 99.92% shareholder approval validating the minority shareholders' compulsory exit. The E&Y valuation at Rs. 196.80 per share was deemed independent and appropriate, rejecting arguments for control premium. The tribunal confirmed no violation of Section 102, noting no mandatory requirement to attach valuation reports for capital reduction. The 25% Discount for Liquidity of Marketability was justified. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, validating the company's capital reduction process and protecting majority shareholder interests.
NCLAT upheld the capital reduction scheme under Section 66 of Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal found the selective capital reduction permissible, with 99.92% shareholder approval validating the minority shareholders' compulsory exit. The E&Y valuation at Rs. 196.80 per share was deemed independent and appropriate, rejecting arguments for control premium. The tribunal confirmed no violation of Section 102, noting no mandatory requirement to attach valuation reports for capital reduction. The 25% Discount for Liquidity of Marketability was justified. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, validating the company's capital reduction process and protecting majority shareholder interests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4920 
