Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the capital reduction scheme under Section 66 of Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal found the selective capital reduction permissible, with 99.92% shareholder approval validating the minority shareholders' compulsory exit. The E&Y valuation at Rs. 196.80 per share was deemed independent and appropriate, rejecting arguments for control premium. The tribunal confirmed no violation of Section 102, noting no mandatory requirement to attach valuation reports for capital reduction. The 25% Discount for Liquidity of Marketability was justified. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, validating the company's capital reduction process and protecting majority shareholder interests.
NCLAT upheld the capital reduction scheme under Section 66 of Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal found the selective capital reduction permissible, with 99.92% shareholder approval validating the minority shareholders' compulsory exit. The E&Y valuation at Rs. 196.80 per share was deemed independent and appropriate, rejecting arguments for control premium. The tribunal confirmed no violation of Section 102, noting no mandatory requirement to attach valuation reports for capital reduction. The 25% Discount for Liquidity of Marketability was justified. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, validating the company's capital reduction process and protecting majority shareholder interests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
