Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the sale transactions of properties under SARFAESI Act. The Tribunal determined that the borrower's right of redemption was extinguished upon issuance of e-auction notice, as per amended Section 13(8). The jural relationship between parties for both properties terminated prior to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commencement, with sale certificates issued before the critical date. The secured creditor's actions were deemed valid, including self-purchase of properties under Sections 13(5A) and 13(5B), and the appellant's contentions regarding non-deposit of sale consideration were rejected.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the sale transactions of properties under SARFAESI Act. The Tribunal determined that the borrower's right of redemption was extinguished upon issuance of e-auction notice, as per amended Section 13(8). The jural relationship between parties for both properties terminated prior to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commencement, with sale certificates issued before the critical date. The secured creditor's actions were deemed valid, including self-purchase of properties under Sections 13(5A) and 13(5B), and the appellant's contentions regarding non-deposit of sale consideration were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.