Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the sale transactions of properties under SARFAESI Act. The Tribunal determined that the borrower's right of redemption was extinguished upon issuance of e-auction notice, as per amended Section 13(8). The jural relationship between parties for both properties terminated prior to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commencement, with sale certificates issued before the critical date. The secured creditor's actions were deemed valid, including self-purchase of properties under Sections 13(5A) and 13(5B), and the appellant's contentions regarding non-deposit of sale consideration were rejected.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the sale transactions of properties under SARFAESI Act. The Tribunal determined that the borrower's right of redemption was extinguished upon issuance of e-auction notice, as per amended Section 13(8). The jural relationship between parties for both properties terminated prior to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process commencement, with sale certificates issued before the critical date. The secured creditor's actions were deemed valid, including self-purchase of properties under Sections 13(5A) and 13(5B), and the appellant's contentions regarding non-deposit of sale consideration were rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.