Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) commercial wisdom in rejecting the resolution plan. The sole CoC member abstained from voting, which was deemed a valid exercise of discretion. The liquidation application was filed with CoC's consent, and an e-auction was conducted where Respondents 4-7 submitted a successful bid of Rs. 20.63 Cr, significantly higher than the Appellant's offer of Rs. 8 Cr. The tribunal confirmed the legality of the liquidation process, emphasizing that the CoC's decision cannot be questioned. The sale certificate was issued to the successful bidders, and the appeal was consequently dismissed, upholding the statutory framework under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
NCLAT upheld the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) commercial wisdom in rejecting the resolution plan. The sole CoC member abstained from voting, which was deemed a valid exercise of discretion. The liquidation application was filed with CoC's consent, and an e-auction was conducted where Respondents 4-7 submitted a successful bid of Rs. 20.63 Cr, significantly higher than the Appellant's offer of Rs. 8 Cr. The tribunal confirmed the legality of the liquidation process, emphasizing that the CoC's decision cannot be questioned. The sale certificate was issued to the successful bidders, and the appeal was consequently dismissed, upholding the statutory framework under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
