Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
HC dismissed the petition challenging GST Tribunal appointment notification. The court held that relaxation of eligibility criteria under Section 110(d) is permissible only for State Government officers who have not completed 25 years of service, and does not extend to All-India Service officers. The petitioner's contention that the notification was premature or ultra vires was rejected, with the court noting that identical relaxations had been granted in ten other States. The notification was found to be legally valid, and the petition was dismissed without merit.
HC dismissed the petition challenging GST Tribunal appointment notification. The court held that relaxation of eligibility criteria under Section 110(d) is permissible only for State Government officers who have not completed 25 years of service, and does not extend to All-India Service officers. The petitioner's contention that the notification was premature or ultra vires was rejected, with the court noting that identical relaxations had been granted in ten other States. The notification was found to be legally valid, and the petition was dismissed without merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
