Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT adjudicated on the validity of statements recorded during survey proceedings under Section 133A. The tribunal held that statements obtained during survey proceedings do not automatically bind the assessee. The burden of proof remains with the assessee to disprove such statements through substantive evidence. Critically, the presumption under Section 292C applies only to documents seized during a search from the assessee's premises, not those obtained during a survey of a third party. The tribunal relied on precedential rulings emphasizing that legal fictions are limited to their specific purpose. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's grounds, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the contested addition based on the lack of evidentiary value in the survey statements and inapplicability of statutory presumptions.
ITAT adjudicated on the validity of statements recorded during survey proceedings under Section 133A. The tribunal held that statements obtained during survey proceedings do not automatically bind the assessee. The burden of proof remains with the assessee to disprove such statements through substantive evidence. Critically, the presumption under Section 292C applies only to documents seized during a search from the assessee's premises, not those obtained during a survey of a third party. The tribunal relied on precedential rulings emphasizing that legal fictions are limited to their specific purpose. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the assessee's grounds, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the contested addition based on the lack of evidentiary value in the survey statements and inapplicability of statutory presumptions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.