Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's admission of a Section 7 Application based on corporate debtor's interest default subsequent to the 10A period. The Tribunal confirmed that the default in interest payment from 26.03.2021 to 31.05.2021, exceeding Rs.9.38 crores, constituted a valid ground for application admission. The Tribunal explicitly clarified that the precise claim amount would be determined during the CIRP verification process, not at the admission stage. The appeal challenging the Section 7 Application was consequently dismissed, maintaining the original order's validity.
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's admission of a Section 7 Application based on corporate debtor's interest default subsequent to the 10A period. The Tribunal confirmed that the default in interest payment from 26.03.2021 to 31.05.2021, exceeding Rs.9.38 crores, constituted a valid ground for application admission. The Tribunal explicitly clarified that the precise claim amount would be determined during the CIRP verification process, not at the admission stage. The appeal challenging the Section 7 Application was consequently dismissed, maintaining the original order's validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
