Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld the conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour. The court modified the sentence, eliminating imprisonment while maintaining the fine of Rs. 30,00,000. The decision was based on the petitioner's admission in a compromise deed, established presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act, and the petitioner's initial denial of settlement after benefiting from complaint withdrawal. The court determined that interests of justice were served by imposing a monetary penalty without imprisonment, considering the case's specific mitigating circumstances and the petitioner's conduct.
HC upheld the conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour. The court modified the sentence, eliminating imprisonment while maintaining the fine of Rs. 30,00,000. The decision was based on the petitioner's admission in a compromise deed, established presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act, and the petitioner's initial denial of settlement after benefiting from complaint withdrawal. The court determined that interests of justice were served by imposing a monetary penalty without imprisonment, considering the case's specific mitigating circumstances and the petitioner's conduct.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.