TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
HC upheld the conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour. The court modified the sentence, eliminating imprisonment while maintaining the fine of Rs. 30,00,000. The decision was based on the petitioner's admission in a compromise deed, established presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act, and the petitioner's initial denial of settlement after benefiting from complaint withdrawal. The court determined that interests of justice were served by imposing a monetary penalty without imprisonment, considering the case's specific mitigating circumstances and the petitioner's conduct.
HC upheld the conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour. The court modified the sentence, eliminating imprisonment while maintaining the fine of Rs. 30,00,000. The decision was based on the petitioner's admission in a compromise deed, established presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act, and the petitioner's initial denial of settlement after benefiting from complaint withdrawal. The court determined that interests of justice were served by imposing a monetary penalty without imprisonment, considering the case's specific mitigating circumstances and the petitioner's conduct.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.