Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT Decision Summary: The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order with modifications, primarily focusing on equitable taxation principles. The tribunal directed the AO to re-compute long-term capital gains by applying the Cost Inflation Index of the year of transfer. The decision rejected revenue's contentions regarding unaccounted transactions, emphasizing that only real income should be taxed. The tribunal confirmed a 30% profit rate for unaccounted business receipts and allowed set-off of expenses against taxed receipts. Key holdings included preventing double taxation, ensuring computational fairness, and adhering to statutory provisions governing capital gains calculation while maintaining the principle of taxing net real income.
ITAT Decision Summary: The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order with modifications, primarily focusing on equitable taxation principles. The tribunal directed the AO to re-compute long-term capital gains by applying the Cost Inflation Index of the year of transfer. The decision rejected revenue's contentions regarding unaccounted transactions, emphasizing that only real income should be taxed. The tribunal confirmed a 30% profit rate for unaccounted business receipts and allowed set-off of expenses against taxed receipts. Key holdings included preventing double taxation, ensuring computational fairness, and adhering to statutory provisions governing capital gains calculation while maintaining the principle of taxing net real income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.