Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated a customs duty dispute involving raw silk fabric imports. The tribunal ruled in favor of the importer, finding that notification conditions deemed impossible to meet cannot be arbitrarily imposed. Referencing precedential SC judgments in SRF Ltd. and AIDEK Tourism Services, the tribunal determined the importer was eligible for duty exemption under N/N. 30/2004-CE as amended by subsequent notifications. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, effectively upholding the importer's original self-assessment of NIL CVD and confirming exemption from additional customs duty based on established judicial interpretations of manufacturing and duty liability principles.
CESTAT adjudicated a customs duty dispute involving raw silk fabric imports. The tribunal ruled in favor of the importer, finding that notification conditions deemed impossible to meet cannot be arbitrarily imposed. Referencing precedential SC judgments in SRF Ltd. and AIDEK Tourism Services, the tribunal determined the importer was eligible for duty exemption under N/N. 30/2004-CE as amended by subsequent notifications. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, effectively upholding the importer's original self-assessment of NIL CVD and confirming exemption from additional customs duty based on established judicial interpretations of manufacturing and duty liability principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.