Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. The court found no merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding retrospective cancellation. The competent authority followed due process under the West Bengal GST Act, 2017, and exercised jurisdiction appropriately. The petitioner failed to produce satisfactory evidence or explanations to justify GST registration continuation. The court determined no procedural irregularities or violations of natural justice occurred, and the verification report was conducted in compliance with legal requirements. Consequently, the petition was rejected, and the GST registration cancellation was upheld.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. The court found no merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding retrospective cancellation. The competent authority followed due process under the West Bengal GST Act, 2017, and exercised jurisdiction appropriately. The petitioner failed to produce satisfactory evidence or explanations to justify GST registration continuation. The court determined no procedural irregularities or violations of natural justice occurred, and the verification report was conducted in compliance with legal requirements. Consequently, the petition was rejected, and the GST registration cancellation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
