Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. The court found no merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding retrospective cancellation. The competent authority followed due process under the West Bengal GST Act, 2017, and exercised jurisdiction appropriately. The petitioner failed to produce satisfactory evidence or explanations to justify GST registration continuation. The court determined no procedural irregularities or violations of natural justice occurred, and the verification report was conducted in compliance with legal requirements. Consequently, the petition was rejected, and the GST registration cancellation was upheld.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. The court found no merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding retrospective cancellation. The competent authority followed due process under the West Bengal GST Act, 2017, and exercised jurisdiction appropriately. The petitioner failed to produce satisfactory evidence or explanations to justify GST registration continuation. The court determined no procedural irregularities or violations of natural justice occurred, and the verification report was conducted in compliance with legal requirements. Consequently, the petition was rejected, and the GST registration cancellation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.