Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, quashing the respondent's rejection order. The court directed the respondent to grant a refund of Rs. 96,65,325/- with 6% interest per annum from 12.09.2021 until actual payment, as per Section 56 of CGST Act. The original ground for refund rejection was found factually incorrect, as the Appellate Authority had indeed specified the refund amount. The petition was consequently disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
HC allowed the petitioner's refund claim, quashing the respondent's rejection order. The court directed the respondent to grant a refund of Rs. 96,65,325/- with 6% interest per annum from 12.09.2021 until actual payment, as per Section 56 of CGST Act. The original ground for refund rejection was found factually incorrect, as the Appellate Authority had indeed specified the refund amount. The petition was consequently disposed of in favor of the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
