Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The AAR determined that tapioca flour derived from dried tapioca root remnants is classified under Chapter heading 23031000, attracting 5% GST. The product, deemed unfit for human consumption and primarily used as livestock feed, was correctly categorized as "Residues of starch manufacture and similar residues". The ruling, based on the applicant's submitted facts, rejected the rectification application under Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, finding no procedural errors in the original advance ruling.
The AAR determined that tapioca flour derived from dried tapioca root remnants is classified under Chapter heading 23031000, attracting 5% GST. The product, deemed unfit for human consumption and primarily used as livestock feed, was correctly categorized as "Residues of starch manufacture and similar residues". The ruling, based on the applicant's submitted facts, rejected the rectification application under Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, finding no procedural errors in the original advance ruling.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
