Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The AAR determined that tapioca flour derived from dried tapioca root remnants is classified under Chapter heading 23031000, attracting 5% GST. The product, deemed unfit for human consumption and primarily used as livestock feed, was correctly categorized as "Residues of starch manufacture and similar residues". The ruling, based on the applicant's submitted facts, rejected the rectification application under Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, finding no procedural errors in the original advance ruling.
The AAR determined that tapioca flour derived from dried tapioca root remnants is classified under Chapter heading 23031000, attracting 5% GST. The product, deemed unfit for human consumption and primarily used as livestock feed, was correctly categorized as "Residues of starch manufacture and similar residues". The ruling, based on the applicant's submitted facts, rejected the rectification application under Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, finding no procedural errors in the original advance ruling.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
