Related-party creditor exclusion bars CoC participation where lender rights show policy-making involvement, and post-CIRP assignment cannot cure ineli...
Rectification of apparent typographical errors may proceed without hearing when tax liability, input tax credit, and ruling substance remain unchanged...
The AAR determined that tapioca flour derived from dried tapioca root remnants is classified under Chapter heading 23031000, attracting 5% GST. The product, deemed unfit for human consumption and primarily used as livestock feed, was correctly categorized as "Residues of starch manufacture and similar residues". The ruling, based on the applicant's submitted facts, rejected the rectification application under Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, finding no procedural errors in the original advance ruling.
The AAR determined that tapioca flour derived from dried tapioca root remnants is classified under Chapter heading 23031000, attracting 5% GST. The product, deemed unfit for human consumption and primarily used as livestock feed, was correctly categorized as "Residues of starch manufacture and similar residues". The ruling, based on the applicant's submitted facts, rejected the rectification application under Section 98(2) of CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017, finding no procedural errors in the original advance ruling.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
