Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the tax department is precluded from repeatedly reassessing the same issue under Section 153A, particularly when prior re-assessment under Section 147 was already completed. The search proceedings did not yield incriminating materials to justify reopening the assessment. The court emphasized the legal principle of finality in judicial proceedings, noting that tax authorities must respect procedural limitations and cannot arbitrarily reopen settled assessments without substantial new evidence. The multiple attempts to reassess the same matter through different legal provisions were deemed improper. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, preventing further tax reassessment on the identical issue.
HC held that the tax department is precluded from repeatedly reassessing the same issue under Section 153A, particularly when prior re-assessment under Section 147 was already completed. The search proceedings did not yield incriminating materials to justify reopening the assessment. The court emphasized the legal principle of finality in judicial proceedings, noting that tax authorities must respect procedural limitations and cannot arbitrarily reopen settled assessments without substantial new evidence. The multiple attempts to reassess the same matter through different legal provisions were deemed improper. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, preventing further tax reassessment on the identical issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.